Friday, December 11, 2009

And so this is Christmas....


Once again we are at that time of year.

Our hard fight and promise of REAL healthcare reform is being stalled and compromised down to Big insurance favors, our hopes of climate legislation is being ambushed by fake and misrepresented rhetoric and scandals, and we are ending a mistake of a war in Iraq to start another mistake in Afghanistan.

Oh.. and it's Christmas time!

And how can you NOT feel the Christmas spirit in the air this year? Despite the millions who are unemployed and probably cannot afford gifts this year for their families. Despite the ones who are uninsured and are one accident or illness away from unaffordable medical bills which leads to overwhelming debt. Despite the insured that were not covered even though they have paid for it. Despite the ones who may be spending next Christmas in Afghanistan fighting a war that has been "dithered" by the previous administration to the point where it may now be un-winnable.

Happy Holidays!

And for those of you who still can't feel the holiday joy and forgot what Christmas is all about, don't worry.....

The Republicans are on it as we speak!

What is that you ask?

Well no..... they are not proposing any ideas to fix the economy. They recommend tax cuts for the rich and deregulation, things that have failed every president to try them and helped create the economic crisis in the first place.

No..... they are not doing anything to fix our broken healthcare system. They presented their healthcare bill a little while back and the CBO wiped their ass with it and gave it back.

No... they do not want to end the war (duh). They actually want more troops and criticize the president for dithering. Even though the Republicans dithered for 7 years and never complained when Bush rejected Gen. McKiernan's request for 22,000 additional troops in Afghanistan. Obama later approved the request and the surge decision he "dithered" on would not take effect until 2010 regardless of when he made it.

Republicans are not doing much of anything about these things, except attempting to obstruct them. Besides, they are doing something much more important anyway....

The Republicans are working through a bill that tells us what Christmas is!

44 Republicans have introduced a Resolution to honor Christmas! And it goes something like this......


Whereas Christmas is a national holiday celebrated on December 25; and

Whereas the Framers intended that the First Amendment of the Constitution, in prohibiting the establishment of religion, would not prohibit any mention of religion or reference to God in civic dialog: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives–

(1) recognizes the importance of the symbols and traditions of Christmas;

(2) strongly disapproves of attempts to ban references to Christmas; and

(3) expresses support for the use of these symbols and traditions by those who celebrate Christmas.


Well at least this isn't one of those frivolous bills. Like in October, when Democrats passed a resolution to honor the birthday of the Chinese philosopher Confucius.

House minority leader John Boehner even gave the Democrats some heat for lack of priority and wasting congress's time....

"While Democrats get ready to celebrate the birth of an ancient Chinese philosopher, House Republicans will talk about our better solutions to create jobs and make health care more affordable and accessible for America’ s seniors. It is unacceptable for Congress to take it easy at a time when the nation’s unemployment rate is nearing 10 percent and millions of out-of-work families struggling to make ends meet are asking, “where are the jobs?”


I actually do agree with Boehner here to certain extent. In these uncertain times we are in at the moment, we should be more focused on the issues that matter most. I have no problem with honoring Confucius's birthday that I know of, but healthcare and the economy must get complete attention. All Boehner is saying is that we don't need frivolous resolutions like this......

H.R. 870: Resolution to officially commemorate the 9/12 taxpayer march on Washington

76 Republicans are on board with Glenn Beck. And much like Beck, they produce fact-less and extreme partisan hyper babble like this....

RESOLUTION

Expressing gratitude and appreciation to the individuals and families who participated in the Taxpayer March on Washington on September 12, 2009.

Whereas, on September 12, 2009, hundreds of thousands of American patriots, who refuse to sit idly by as the Federal Government advances skyrocketing deficits, taxpayer-funded bailouts, pork-barrel projects, burdensome taxes, unaccountable policy czars, command-and-control energy policy, and a government takeover of health care, came to Washington, DC, to show their disapproval;

Whereas individuals also wanted to convey their displeasure with the future tax increases that will be required to pay for deficit-financed spending;

Whereas these individuals understand that the fundamental American principles of limited government and personal liberty are under direct assault;

Whereas this dedicated group of freedom-loving Americans believe in open, accountable, responsible, constitutionally based government;

Whereas hundreds of buses, multiple caravans of cars from across the country, and many individually chartered flights, as well as thousands of lone-traveling cars and trucks, brought these patriots to Washington, DC, solely for this event;

Whereas these individuals endured considerable personal expense to get to the march, including transportation and lodging expenses, as well as lost wages in many instances;

Whereas estimates of the number of people who peacefully marched from Freedom Plaza to the West Front of the U.S. Capitol on September 12, 2009, range as high as 1,700,000 marchers;

Whereas all 50 States were represented in the march;

Whereas this event is considered to be the largest ever gathering of fiscal conservatives in Washington, DC;

Whereas special accolades are due to the grassroots citizens organizations across the country who helped individuals exercise their constitutionally protected First Amendment rights in the Nation’s capital; and

Whereas when the current trends of government expansion and freedom retrenchment are reversed, it will be due in large part to the efforts of the hundreds of thousands who marched on Washington, DC, on September 12, 2009: Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives expresses its gratitude and appreciation to the hundreds of thousands of people who marched on Washington, DC, on September 12, 2009, to show their love of liberty and their grievance with recent government actions.


For the record, it was 60,000 to 70,000 in attendance by the Washington D.C. Fire Department's count, but the Fire Dept. is a socialist organization and known to have a rampant liberal bias. So they decided to trust the completely non bias reports of Fox "News" and Michelle Malkin, who got their numbers from counts done by photographs of the event.

Is this the kind of thing John Boehner was talking about?

Oh well, at least the Christmas resolution isn't frivolous or wasteful. Thank goodness the Republicans are there to educate us on what Christmas is, while the elitist left just insults our intelligence.

And who better to clarify how we should celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ than the Republicans? The party that is pro-war, pro-rich, pro-healthcare for profit, pro-death penalty, pro-rape (30 of them), pro-life (only until your born), pro-gun, anti-gay, and countless adultery at C-Street.

I'm sure Jesus is very proud of the Republicans these days.

However, maybe I'm being to harsh. I should reserve judgement until the CBO scores the Christmas resolution. So that we can see how many jobs it creates and/or saves, or how much it lowers healthcare costs.

And now the soldiers who will be sent to fight in an uncertain and possibly un-winnable war in Afghanistan will be fighting for America and fighting against the evil-doers who are trying to ban references to Christmas.

I just have one question.....

Exactly who is trying to ban Christmas?

Thursday, December 3, 2009

THEIR Messiah: Would he be Welcome in Today's Republican Party?


2008 was not a good year for the Republicans.

After 8 years of George W. Bush, who was leaving office with record low approval ratings, along with Republicans witnessing one of the nastiest, sloppiest campaigns to remain in the White House with candidates the party was half-hearted about at best...

Barack Obama won the presidential election with an exceptional margin.

And the Republicans have been scrambling ever since.....

Here at the end of 2009, it has been said and viewed that the traditional GOP and the hardline tea party conservatives are in a political civil war. With more and more third party conservative candidates running against the Republican brand in 2010, it appears the teabagger's strategy is to split the vote and destroy any hope of stopping the one man they blame for everything that has ever went wrong throughout history.

But if you ask me, it's hard to tell the difference between the two. They are in step and holding hands politically, possibly even some heavy petting. Or God forbid, some good old fashioned unprotected pre-marital sex! .... Okay, I'll stop...

When you have GOP leadership holding tea party events and skipping out on work to give speeches at these events, it says a lot. It says that the far right is moving farther to the right and is out of options of their own. That they would rather cater to the angry mob of deficit hawks as of January '09 and anti-government military supporters and medicare recipients. They would rather blend in with the "grassroots" citizens that are bused in and equipped with prepared talking points and offensive signs. They would rather seek refuge in the fringe than practice the moderation they so blatantly preach to the left.

As for the moderates that are left in the Republican party, they are either facing primary challengers from the RNC or third party conservatives.

They have resorted to eating their own.

And if you don't believe me, then please explain the Purity test ..... that 40 Republicans failed. Ouch.

I don't think any of this will help the Republican brand. I would even go as far to say that it will make things worse. If the RNC continues to alter itself more hardline and let the far-right fringe protesters take over the party, it will be more damaging to the GOP than the 8 years of Republican rule were.

Yes! I am aware that far-left liberals protested profusely under Bush. (Most were in protest of a war in Iraq, a country that has never attacked us and was no threat to us) The difference is though, that you didn't see figures such as Nancy Pelosi and/or Harry Reid out there setting up anti-Bush rallies and speaking at them. Directly connecting themselves to their cause and embracing them.

Anyway, my point is not to ramble on about what conservatives are up to these days. It's more about who they look up to.

Civil war within the base or not, every conservative from the most hawkish neo-con to the most socially moderate Eisenhower Republican can and do agree on one thing......

That Ronald Reagan is a God!

Decades later, this brand of Kool-Aid has not worn off. The ideology and beliefs of Ronald Reagan stand firm and honored in all sectors of today's Republican party. Today's GOP still believes in "Reaganomics" (Trickle-down economics) that never really trickled down, and still repeat Reagan's mantra about how government is the problem and now they blame it for all of America's problems. In this day and age of ACORN and socialism, conservatives long for the days when Ronald Reagan would have put a stop to all this liberal nonsense.

Although, a little research and examination makes one wonder.....

Would Reagan be accepted? Would the "Gipper" be pure enough for today's hardline conservative and Republican parties? Reagan? Not conservative enough? Scary thought, huh? If we break down Reagan's policy and legislation and compare it to the political argument raised by teabaggers and hardline Republicans, it turns out that Reagan could be considered in today's political climate as just another RINO. That or many of the fringe right are hypocrites, but there is no way that can be possible.... is there?

For example, teabaggers claim that they are protesting the rampant spending and deficit of the current administration. First off, they have a lot of nerve after not only being completely silent when W. rampantly spent and created a record deficit but even defending it. They may have the gull, but they also have a short memory.

When Reagan took office our national debt was about $953 Billion. When Reagan left office our national debt was at $2.7 Trillion. The deficit rose by almost 3 times it's initial size during the Reagan years.

As far as spending, it went up 57% under Reagan. At about 7% a year. Although most of the jump in spending was for defense, the one government program Republicans DO love and love pouring money into. However in the dry grit of our situation here, Reagan also increased spending.

While we are on the subject of the economy, lets look at a few other things that you might not know about everyone's favorite Republican.... or at least the things that the right never tells you about him.... or maybe they just don't know...

Like Reagan's campaign promise as governor to "send the welfare bums back to work" ...... Charming!

Also as Governor, Reagan opposed worker's rights by opposing the efforts of the United Farm Workers to improve working conditions and wages for vulnerable migrant agricultural laborers. Also, he vetoed the California Agricultural Labor Relations Act that would give farm workers the right to unionize.

He opposed women's rights by opposing the Equal Rights Amendment that gives equal rights to women.

Under Reagan, productivity increased while working class wages remained frozen.

The teabaggers also fear that the democrats will raise their taxes. This is one of the biggest confusions in politics right now. Republicans say that they are about lower taxes, and they are..... for the rich. Unless you are in that top 1%, you have most likely seen a tax increase under republican presidents and have seen your taxes reduced under democratic presidents.

Reagan took this to the next level and virtually cut the richest Americans taxes in half over his presidency.

26-Oct-09
Historical Highest Marginal Income Tax Rates

Year Top Marginal Rate

1913 7.0% 1946 86.45% 1979 70.00%
1914 7.0% 1947 86.45% 1980 70.00% -----------
1915 7.0% 1948 82.13% 1981 69.13% T
1916 15.0% 1949 82.13% 1982 50.00% A
1917 67.0% 1950 91.00% 1983 50.00% X
1918 77.0% 1951 91.00% 1984 50.00%
1919 73.0% 1952 92.00% 1985 50.00% C
1920 73.0% 1953 92.00% 1986 50.00% U
1921 73.0% 1954 91.00% 1987 38.50% T
1922 56.0% 1955 91.00% 1988 28.00% ----------
1923 56.0% 1956 91.00% 1989 28.00%
1924 46.0% 1957 91.00% 1990 31.00%
1925 25.0% 1958 91.00% 1991 31.00%
1926 25.0% 1959 91.00% 1992 31.00%
1927 25.0% 1960 91.00% 1993 39.60%
1928 25.0% 1961 91.00% 1994 39.60%
1929 24.0% 1962 91.00% 1995 39.60%
1930 25.0% 1963 91.00% 1996 39.60%
1931 25.0% 1964 77.00% 1997 39.60%
1932 63.0% 1965 70.00% 1998 39.60%
1933 63.0% 1966 70.00% 1999 39.60%
1934 63.0% 1967 70.00% 2000 39.60%
1935 63.0% 1968 75.25% 2001 38.60%
1936 79.0% 1969 77.00% 2002 38.60%
1937 79.0% 1970 71.75% 2003 35.00%
1938 79.0% 1971 70.00% 2004 35.00%
1939 79.0% 1972 70.00% 2005 35.00%
1940 81.10% 1973 70.00% 2006 35.00%
1941 81.00% 1974 70.00% 2007 35.00%
1942 88.00% 1975 70.00% 2008 35.00%
1943 88.00% 1976 70.00% 2009 35.00%
1944 94.00% 1977 70.00% 2010 35.00%
1945 94.00% 1978 70.00%

http://www.taxpolicycenter.org

The wealth never trickled down and the rich got richer while the poor got poorer. The 80's was the "Me" generation. Ayn Rand couldn't have been happier and Reagan showed a nation how to smile as they killed. How to gift wrap greed and sell it to a gullible nation that will turn a blind eye to it's own best interest in order to make a point to someone, somewhere. Reaganomics was great, if you root for the bad guy in the movies.

Oh well, surely he would be in line with the conservatives 100% on social issues like abortion, gun control, and immigration?

Well, kind of, but a look at Reagan's record may of had him facing a primary challenger and apologizing to Rush Limbaugh in today's GOP.

In 1967, when Reagan was governor of California, he signed the Therapeutic Abortion Act. This law has been said to be the most liberal abortion law in America before Roe v Wade. Believe it or not, it also allowed abortions to be covered by California's state Medicaid program. Federal funds for abortions...... I hear that one is a big No-No.

Of course later on in Reagan's political career he strongly opposed abortion. This is said to be because so many abortions were performed under the Therapeutic Abortion Act, even more than the sponsors of the bill ever imagined there would be. Reagan's abortion law ultimately turned Reagan against abortion. You could say the Therapeutic Abortion Act worked too good.

Even though he later denounced abortion after being responsible for so many, would the teabaggers accept this kind of behavior from let's say.... President Obama? Of course not! Abortion is obviously a very important issue to the teabaggers and the pro-life movement. So they must hate Reagan, right? I mean, once a baby killer, always a baby killer?

The tea party protesters and most of the right have made it clear that they will reign holy hell on us wimpy liberals if we take their guns away. And they have been sweating bullets since Obama's election that he would take them back to the days of using a bow and arrow to kill people. If only reading and research made them feel as good as a loaded weapon does. Then maybe they would actually know who is trying to take their guns away from them, if anyone.

So far President Obama and the democrats have not passed or even pushed one anti-gun bill or law. Actually, as of this year, you can now carry guns in public parks, some bars, colleges, and check them on trains; where you could not before Obama took office. If President Obama is trying to take your guns away.... he is going about it the wrong way.

As for the first sitting President to address the NRA......

Once again in 1967, as governor, Reagan signed into law the Mulford Act, a law that forbid the carrying of weapons in public. In 1991, he publicly supported the Brady Bill, a bill that would establish a waiting period for gun purchases and was heavily opposed by the NRA and guns rights groups.

So as it stands right now, Reagan has done more to take your guns away than Obama has.

Immigration is a big heated issue, as we are about to find out next year when immigration reform makes it's way to the center stage in congress. The right is very clear, cut, and dry when it comes to immigration. If you are an illegal immigrant you should get out. That simple. That's how Reagan would do it, right?

In 1986, now as president, Reagan signed the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986. This bill allowed a path of amnesty for illegal immigrants who could prove that they have been in the U.S. for a certain period of time.

Remember this fact when immigration reform starts up.


While much of what I state about Reagan in this blog is from way back when he was just the governor of California, actions are still actions, and they speak louder than words. Most on the right would pounce on these same actions if a liberal did them. They hold large protests now at the mere thought of democrats doing it. They dig deep into the early years of President Obama's czars trying to fetch any scrap they can, anything to make this president look bad. Yet most of them probably cannot name a single one of Bush's 47 czars off the top of their heads. They shutter at the thought of democrats enacting these crazy socialist laws that mostly seem to work. But when one of theirs does it..... cricket.... cricket. Sweet silence.

Would it be rude of me to suggest that the republicans are very much about "Do as they say, not as they do"?

Due to his record, Ronald Reagan would probably fail the "purity" tests of today's GOP and would probably be seen as a RINO. I am not pointing this out for ridicule or humor. I am pointing it out because it scares the crap out of me. The republican party use to be something great, that even I as a progressive liberal have always admired. Though anymore, it just seems like a slippery slope toward objectivism and obstruction.

As for the tea party protesters, I can only come to 3 possible conclusions as to why they have let Reagan and so many other Republicans off the hook for doing the very things they claim Democrats are doing. Either......

1. They don't know
2. They don't care
3. They don't care enough to know

Or just maybe.....\

4. They hate Obama more than they love America.


Do as they say, not as they do.....

What happens when people stop doing both?

Wednesday, December 2, 2009

UPDATE: RAPE-publicans: It's all Franken's Fault?

Courtesy of TPM & dailyKOS

Senate GOPers: It's Al Franken's Fault We're Being Attacked For Votes Against Anti-Rape Amendment

The Politico reports that Senate Republicans are outraged at Sen. Al Franken (D-MN) due to their votes against an amendment he introduced, to crack down on the rape of employees of military contractors, now being used against them:

The Republicans are steamed at Franken because partisans on the left are using a measure he sponsored to paint them as rapist sympathizers -- and because Franken isn't doing much to stop them.

"Trying to tap into the natural sympathy that we have for this victim of this rape --and use that as a justification to frankly misrepresent and embarrass his colleagues, I don't think it's a very constructive thing," Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) said in an interview.

...

"I don't know what his motivation was for taking us on, but I would hope that we won't see a lot of Daily Kos-inspired amendments in the future coming from him," said South Dakota Sen. John Thune, No. 4 in the Senate Republican leadership. "I think hopefully he'll settle down and do kind of the serious work of legislating that's important to Minnesota."

No, this is not The Onion.

This is real.

"The Party of NO".... Unless we are talking about rape.

In that case, go crazy!

The Republican party obviously has.....